If you’re shopping for a reliable Linux VPS in 2025, you’ll likely run into two names: KVM and OpenVZ.
At first glance, they might seem similar. Both technologies are used to host thousands of VPS servers globally and support high availability. But under the hood, KVM and OpenVZ are built very differently — and that matters, especially when performance, isolation, and control are critical.
In this deep dive, we explain why KVM VPS hosting is the modern default, and why OpenVZ is increasingly limited for container stacks, security workloads, and DevOps deployments.
What Is KVM VPS?
KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualisation method built into the Linux kernel. It enables running completely isolated virtual machines (VMs) with:
- Dedicated kernel per guest OS
- Full resource control (CPU, memory, I/O)
- Support for multiple OS types — Linux, Windows, BSD
- Native hardware virtualization support (Intel VT-x, AMD-V)
Each KVM VPS behaves like an independent server, offering full root access and high performance, ideal for developers, sysadmins, and production workloads.
What Is OpenVZ?
OpenVZ is a container-based virtualization technique. It creates isolated Linux environments on a shared kernel. Unlike KVM, you can’t run different kernel versions or other operating systems.
Key limitations of OpenVZ include:
- Shared kernel across all containers
- No support for custom modules or kernel tuning
- Lower isolation and security
- Limited compatibility with DevOps tools like Docker or Kubernetes
While OpenVZ may still work for basic static sites or legacy apps, it’s not a future-ready platform.
KVM vs OpenVZ: 2025 Comparison
| Feature | KVM VPS | OpenVZ VPS |
| Kernel Access | ✔️ Custom kernel per VM | ❌ Shared host kernel only |
| OS Support | ✔️ Linux, Windows, BSD | ❌ Linux only |
| Security Isolation | ✔️ Full hardware layer | ⚠️ Container-level only |
| Docker/K8s Ready | ✔️ Native compatibility | ⚠️ Limited/broken |
| DevOps Tools (Ansible, Terraform) | ✔️ Fully compatible | ⚠️ May break IaC assumptions |
| cPanel/WHM | ✔️ Fully supported | ⚠️ Often blocked |
| Performance Stability | ✔️ Predictable under load | ⚠️ Varies with host usage |
| ISO Boot & Custom OS | ✔️ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Nested Virtualization | ✔️ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
Why KVM VPS Is the Developer’s Favorite
1. Kernel-Level Control
With KVM, you can enable BBR, WireGuard, or tune sysctl flags. OpenVZ locks you to the host kernel, restricting these optimizations.
2. Dedicated Resources
KVM allocates real memory and CPU slices via hardware support. There’s no risk of “noisy neighbor” slowdown, unlike OpenVZ, where RAM and CPU are often oversubscribed.
3. Broad OS Compatibility
PetroSky’s KVM VPS supports Ubuntu, Debian, AlmaLinux, Rocky, CentOS, and Windows — plus custom ISO uploads.
4. Nested Virtualization
You can even run VMs inside your KVM VPS — ideal for CI/CD pipelines, developer sandboxes, or advanced training labs.
KVM VPS: Better Security by Design
- Each KVM VPS has isolated disk, memory, and CPU resources.
- No shared kernel: attacks targeting one guest OS can’t affect others.
- AppArmor, SELinux, and firewall tools are fully functional.
In contrast, OpenVZ containers can suffer cross-container exposure if the host kernel is compromised — making KVM the preferred option for VPN servers, compliance-bound apps, and financial workloads.
Performance Benchmark
In PetroSky’s test environments, KVM consistently beats OpenVZ:
| Metric | KVM VPS | OpenVZ VPS |
| Sysbench CPU Score | 10,300+ | ~9,000 |
| IOPS (NVMe) | 110K+ | ~80K |
| Network Throughput | ~940 Mbps | ~790 Mbps |
| Redis Operations/sec | 75K+ | ~58K |
These differences grow under load, especially with database or parallel processing workloads.
What About VPS Pricing?
PetroSky’s KVM VPS plans are cost-effective, even compared to container-based alternatives:
- No hidden fees — full root access, firewall control, and snapshots are standard.
- Snapshot backups, IPv6 dual-stack, and ISO boots are included even in base plans.
- Flat-rate billing — no surprise charges for basic features.
If you’re looking for a cheap Linux VPS that doesn’t compromise on performance or flexibility, KVM is the answer — without hidden licensing or support limitations.
Best Use Cases for KVM VPS Hosting
- Hosting cPanel, Plesk, or web panels
- Running Docker, Kubernetes, or Podman
- Enabling custom kernel modules (VPNs, WireGuard)
- CI/CD agents and automation scripts
- Database and API workloads
- VPNs, proxy services, and firewalled apps
- Nested virtualisation testbeds
✅ FAQs
- Can I install any OS on a KVM VPS?
Yes — PetroSky supports custom ISO upload and provides official images for Ubuntu, CentOS, Debian, AlmaLinux, and even Windows. - Is KVM better than OpenVZ for Docker or Kubernetes?
Absolutely. KVM supports kernel features, cgroups, and overlay networks natively — OpenVZ breaks compatibility with container stacks. - Does KVM VPS come with root access?
Yes. Every KVM VPS at PetroSky is fully root-enabled, with no restrictions on package managers, firewalls, or system utilities.